Re: [ldm-users] user-stories for the LDM replacement

• To: "Tyler Allison" <tyler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "LDM-USERS" <ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: [ldm-users] user-stories for the LDM replacement
• From: "Robert Mullenax" <Robert.Mullenax@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 05:28:51 -0500

Well another me, too I guess.

Well, if panic is setting in over GEMPAK going away (or going to Java), the 
double panic for this.  I don't want to sound ungrateful, but I can't imagine a 
worst decision than replacing LDM.  Why must the computing world continually 
change and upgrade for the sake of change and upgrade? 

LDM is universally recognized as an incredibly stable and dependable program.  
Can Unidata provide information on who is seeking a replacement for LDM?

Robert Mullenax
CSBF/NMSU 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [ldm-users] user-stories for the LDM replacement
    • From: Ray Weber

• References:
  • [ldm-users] user-stories for the LDM replacement
    • From: Steve Emmerson
  • Re: [ldm-users] user-stories for the LDM replacement
    • From: Daryl Herzmann
  • Re: [ldm-users] user-stories for the LDM replacement
    • From: Gilbert Sebenste
  • Re: [ldm-users] user-stories for the LDM replacement
    • From: Gerry Creager
  • Re: [ldm-users] user-stories for the LDM replacement
    • From: Tyler Allison