Becky
Thanks for getting back to me. We are interested in the 12 km NAM and 13 km
(130 grid) RAP data. If that's possible, it'd be a help. When I first asked
on the LDM list, there was at least one other researcher interested in
higher resolution NAM and RAP. Somehow, I don't think I'd be the only user.
Appreciate the help, and I fully understand about the delays for new
systems and schedules.
Regards,
Gerry
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Rebecca Cosgrove <rebecca.cosgrove@xxxxxxxx
> wrote:
> **
> Gerry,
> I apologize for my delayed response.
> Right now we've got a limit on adding new data to CONDUIT until we upgrade
> our system here at NCEP. We're in the process of that upgrade right now.
> I'll submit your request for additional NAM 12km fields to the User
> Committee meeting on the 17th for consideration after the upgrade. If
> others in the group would like to see this data, I encourage you to chime
> in and voice your desire for this as well.
>
> For the RAP, we do have 20km and 40km grids for the CONUS available in
> CONDUIT. Is there additional RAP data you are interested in?
>
> Becky Cosgrove
> NCEP Central Operations
>
> CONDUIT folk
>
> We're working on a project and I'd configured a CONDUIT feed to acquire
> NAM 218 data. My plan was to kick off processing using a PQACT action when
> the last of the needed data arrived. Problem: We get the surface fields,
> which is not sufficient to initialize WRF. Of course, I can go download the
> data from NCEP (in fact, that's what we're now doing) but I'm wondering: Am
> I the only one looking for these data? Is there sufficient bandwidth to
> allow carrying the full NAM 12 km dataset? What's the chances of getting
> NAM (and, for that matter, RAP) added?
>
> Thanks, Gerry
> OU/CIMMS/NSSL
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> conduit mailing listconduit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For list information or to unsubscribe, visit:
> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/
>
>
