[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[TIGGE #MFC-218184]: Fwd: [Fwd: [Fwd: Re: TIGGE]]


> ECMWF is having trouble receiving a complete set of NCEP TIGGE fields
> via
> the CONDUIT feed.  Do you have any suggestions on potential solutions to
> the problem?
> Regards,
> Doug
> Begin forwarded message:
> > From: Baudouin Raoult <address@hidden>
> > Date: November 6, 2006 8:58:18 AM MST
> > To: address@hidden
> > Cc: Manuel Fuentes <address@hidden>
> > Subject: [Fwd: [Fwd: Re: TIGGE]]
> > Reply-To: address@hidden
> >
> > Doug,
> >
> > I am more concerned about
> > using conduit and not being able to get a complete set. I am
> > monitoring
> > the fields from ncep and we have missing fields every day (I will
> > compile a list of missing fields when I come back from Korea). So we
> > really need to make sure that we have a complete archive.
> >
> > Baudouin

I'ts difficult to say something meaningful without knowing more
about the problem.  Why do you say that you're missing products?
Is the product-queue sized correctly?  What are the statistics
on the age of the oldest product in the queue? 

I do have a beta release of the LDM that is less likely to miss
data-products under certain circumstances.  Would you be interested
in trying it?

Steve Emmerson

Ticket Details
Ticket ID: MFC-218184
Department: Support IDD TIGGE
Priority: Normal
Status: Closed

NOTE: All email exchanges with Unidata User Support are recorded in the Unidata inquiry tracking system and then made publicly available through the web. If you do not want to have your interactions made available in this way, you must let us know in each email you send to us.