Matt,
We're also running LDM on a number of VMs here at ESRL/GSD, including a
pair behind a load balancer for very high availability. We generally put
our ldm queues in tmpfs, and so get excellent throughput and low latency.
One issue we had early on, now resolved, was ensuring that timekeeping on
the VMs was being handled properly.
Bob L.
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Tom Yoksas <yoksas@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> On 04/05/2016 12:26 PM, Matthew Foster - NOAA Federal wrote:
>
>> We're looking into standing up an LDM cluster on virtualized servers,
>> and are wondering if anyone else has done this. We are wanting to learn
>> of any experiences or pitfalls that might help us along this path. We
>> would likely set up something very similar to the cluster described on
>> this page
>> <http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/newsletter/2005june/clusterpiece.htm>, but
>> in VMs, rather than bare-metal servers.
>>
>> Thanks for any suggestions or advice.
>>
>
> I believe that this is exactly what NCEP did for their CONDUIT top level
> IDD relay site. I suggest you send an email to Carissa Klemmer
> <Carissa.L.Klemmer@xxxxxxxx> and CC their dataflow group,
> ncep.list.pmb-dataflow@xxxxxxxx.
>
> I hope that this helps...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tom
> --
> +----------------------------------------------------------------------+
> * Tom Yoksas UCAR Unidata Program *
> * (303) 497-8642 (last resort) P.O. Box 3000 *
> * yoksas@xxxxxxxx Boulder, CO 80307 *
> * Unidata WWW Service http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/ *
> +----------------------------------------------------------------------+
>
> _______________________________________________
> ldm-users mailing list
> ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For list information or to unsubscribe, visit:
> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/
