[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
960416: Bad test result under Ultrix
- Subject: 960416: Bad test result under Ultrix
- Date: Tue, 16 Apr 96 07:54:36 -0600
Charles,
>Date: Mon, 15 Apr 1996 17:03:29 -0600
>From: Russ Rew <address@hidden>
>To: address@hidden (Charles Packer)
>Subject: Re: 960415: Bad test result under Ultrix
>Keywords: 199604152011.AA25912
In the above message, Charles wrote:
> > *> make test
> >
> > making `test' in directory /usr/users/packer/netc/src/xdr
> >
> > gcc -c -O -I/usr/include/rpc -std -Dconst= xdrtest.c
> > gcc: unrecognized option `-std'
> > gcc -o xdrtest -O xdrtest.o xdr.o xdrfloat.o xdrstdio.o xdrarray.o
> > ./xdrtest > xdrtest_out.new
> > diff xdrtest_out.new testout.sav
> > *** XDR passes formatted test ***
> > cmp test.xdr test_xdr.sav
> > test.xdr test_xdr.sav differ: char 3477, line 1
> > *** XDR fails binary test ***
> > *** Error code 1
gcc(1) wouldn't understand the `-std' option: only the DEC C compiler
would. The configure script in the released package will add that
option to CFLAGS if and only if the C compiler is `cc' (it isn't) and
the CPU is a VAX (possible). I suspect that something else is afoot,
e.g. the variable CFLAGS is defined in the environment or in in the
CUSTOMIZE file as containing `-std'.
--------
Steve Emmerson <address@hidden>
