Gabe, >Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 18:19:21 -0400 (EDT) >From: Gabe Langbauer <address@hidden> >Organization: Ohio State University >To: Steve Emmerson <address@hidden> >Subject: Re: ldm upgrade...acting odd The above message contained the following: > I know that the old pqact is being used because (the most obvious thing) > the continued creation of data in the data/EXP with the suffix _old This > call was created as a test to try to figure out which pqact was running. That would work IF the old and new pqact(1) utilities used different configuration-files. By default, they both use the non-version-specific configuration-file $HOME/etc/pqact.conf. In the LDM configuration-file that was being used by the version 6.1.0 LDM, did the pqact(1) EXEC entry explicitly specify a pqact(1) configuration file? If not, then you might be confusing an "etc/" subdirectory in a version-specific subdirectory with the version-independent one in the LDM user's home directory. Version-specific subdirectories should not contain "etc/" subdirectories (but did in your case). Regards, Steve Emmerson
NOTE: All email exchanges with Unidata User Support are recorded in the Unidata inquiry tracking system and then made publicly available through the web. If you do not want to have your interactions made available in this way, you must let us know in each email you send to us.