Due to the current gap in continued funding from the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF), the NSF Unidata Program Center has temporarily paused most operations. See NSF Unidata Pause in Most Operations for details.
Hi Bill,Yeah, at first, I also thought that it was an interference pattern, but zooming in (up to the point they disappear from being zoomed too far), I get this:
http://www.cimms.ou.edu/~kmanross/VCPRPE/VisADSamples/Alpha_Pattern_newJava_zoom.gifFor reference, this is roughly above the highest "peak" in the jagged white line at the bottom of:
http://www.cimms.ou.edu/~kmanross/VCPRPE/VisADSamples/Alpha_Pattern_newJava.gifIt is where the first (bottom) purple wedge overlays the 2nd (from bottom) yellow wedge.
Yes, the section of code that produces this plot are identical between the two examples. The only difference is the java APIs.
Also, when testing this on different machines - notably with the newer java(2/3) APIs - I get the same pattern.
Thanks! -kevin. Bill Hibbard wrote:
Hi Kevin, The pattern in your second image looks like interference between the screen pixel dot pattern and the pattern of your data displayed as discrete points. If you zoom in, you should see the purple areas become discrete points. Please let me know what happens when you zoom way into both your first and second images. Are they generated using identical application code and data? I searched our CVS log for changes that might affect whether an IrregularSet is displayd as filled triangles or discrete points, and couldn't find any (but of course I may have missed the change).
-- +------------------------------------------------------------+ Kevin L. Manross [KD5MYD] <>< (405)-366-0557 CIMMS Research Associate kevin.manross@xxxxxxxx [NSSL-WRDD/SWATN] http://www.cimms.ou.edu/~kmanross "My opinions are my own and not representative of CIMMS, NSSL, NOAA or any affiliates" +------------------------------------------------------------+
visad
archives: