Re: [netcdfgroup] Future file formats

I, as a PnetCDF developer, have never used the term "netcdf-5".
I always use cdf-5 or cdf5 to refer the file format, as "cdf" plus
a single character (e.g. '1', '2', or '5') is the signature string
stored in the file header for I/O libraries such as NetCDF, PnetCDF,
and probably some others to tell the format.

In my opinion, "netcdf-4" is better used to refer to the library,
instead of a format, but I can see many have already use the term
for both. I simply hope the version character in the signature string
will not run out too quickly :)

Wei-keng

On Nov 1, 2017, at 3:01 PM, Gerry Creager - NOAA Affiliate wrote:

> Perhaps we should follow the example of the IP networking world and 
> completely foregoe netCDF-5, heading straight to netCDF-6. 
> 
> gerry
> 
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:44 PM, dmh@xxxxxxxx <dmh@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Actually, the term "netcdf-5" got usurped by the
> developers of pnetcdf, which supports a slightly extended
> version of netcdf-3. The most recent versions of the netcdf-c
> library support the netcdf-5 format
> So the next available number would
> be netcdf-6.
> 
> You might look at this.
> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/blogs/developer/en/entry/high-performance-netcdf-4-proposal
> 
> =Dennis Heimbigner
>  Unidata
> 
> 
> On 11/1/2017 1:27 PM, Julian Kunkel wrote:
> Dear all,
> there was many years ago the April fool:
> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/blogs/developer/entry/netcdf_5_format_to_be
> 
> I'm just curious if there are activities known by you that actually
> move on towards any NetCDF-5 format?
> 
> Regards,
> Julian
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE: All exchanges posted to Unidata maintained email lists are
> recorded in the Unidata inquiry tracking system and made publicly
> available through the web.  Users who post to any of the lists we
> maintain are reminded to remove any personal information that they
> do not want to be made public.
> 
> 
> netcdfgroup mailing list
> netcdfgroup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For list information or to unsubscribe,  visit: 
> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Gerry Creager
> NSSL/CIMMS
> 405.325.6371
> ++++++++++++++++++++++
> “Big whorls have little whorls,
> That feed on their velocity; 
> And little whorls have lesser whorls, 
> And so on to viscosity.” 
> Lewis Fry Richardson (1881-1953)
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE: All exchanges posted to Unidata maintained email lists are
> recorded in the Unidata inquiry tracking system and made publicly
> available through the web.  Users who post to any of the lists we
> maintain are reminded to remove any personal information that they
> do not want to be made public.
> 
> 
> netcdfgroup mailing list
> netcdfgroup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For list information or to unsubscribe,  visit: 
> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/



  • 2017 messages navigation, sorted by:
    1. Thread
    2. Subject
    3. Author
    4. Date
    5. ↑ Table Of Contents
  • Search the netcdfgroup archives: