Due to the current gap in continued funding from the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF), the NSF Unidata Program Center has temporarily paused most operations. See NSF Unidata Pause in Most Operations for details.
Due to the current gap in continued funding from the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF), the NSF Unidata Program Center has temporarily paused most operations. See NSF Unidata Pause in Most Operations for details.
Actually, the term "netcdf-5" got usurped by the developers of pnetcdf, which supports a slightly extended version of netcdf-3. The most recent versions of the netcdf-c library support the netcdf-5 format So the next available number would be netcdf-6. You might look at this. http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/blogs/developer/en/entry/high-performance-netcdf-4-proposal =Dennis Heimbigner Unidata On 11/1/2017 1:27 PM, Julian Kunkel wrote:
Dear all, there was many years ago the April fool: http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/blogs/developer/entry/netcdf_5_format_to_be I'm just curious if there are activities known by you that actually move on towards any NetCDF-5 format? Regards, Julian
netcdfgroup archives: