Re: compiling netcdf

Warren Turkal <wt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Thursday 05 April 2007 15:36, Ed Hartnett wrote:
>> Nope. Is there some reason that it should?
> Well, I don't know if it should be default, but it enables to a different 
> memory model that may be useful for large datasets. I am not familiar enough 
> with how NetCDF works to make a really educated assessment. I have a user 
> that is having a hard time stuffing a very large dataset into NetCDF, and I 
> think it may have something to do with this limitation. I may be way off base 
> though.
>> The general idea is that if there are any flags that need to be set
>> for your compiler, you must set them.
> This seems reasonable.
>> The exception is that the netCDF configure does set the correct flag
>> to allow the fortran wrapper functions to work (if it can figure that
>> out from the name of your fortran compiler).
> Again, reasonable.
> Thanks,
> wt
> -- 
> Warren Turkal

Is your user using 64-bit offset format?

It's explained here:

Ed Hartnett  -- ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

To unsubscribe netcdfgroup, visit: