Due to the current gap in continued funding from the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF), the NSF Unidata Program Center has temporarily paused most operations. See NSF Unidata Pause in Most Operations for details.

Re: compiling netcdf

On Thursday 05 April 2007 15:36, Ed Hartnett wrote:
> Nope. Is there some reason that it should?

Well, I don't know if it should be default, but it enables to a different 
memory model that may be useful for large datasets. I am not familiar enough 
with how NetCDF works to make a really educated assessment. I have a user 
that is having a hard time stuffing a very large dataset into NetCDF, and I 
think it may have something to do with this limitation. I may be way off base 
though.

> The general idea is that if there are any flags that need to be set
> for your compiler, you must set them.

This seems reasonable.

> The exception is that the netCDF configure does set the correct flag
> to allow the fortran wrapper functions to work (if it can figure that
> out from the name of your fortran compiler).

Again, reasonable.

Thanks,
wt
-- 
Warren Turkal

==============================================================================
To unsubscribe netcdfgroup, visit:
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing-list-delete-form.html
==============================================================================


  • 2007 messages navigation, sorted by:
    1. Thread
    2. Subject
    3. Author
    4. Date
    5. ↑ Table Of Contents
  • Search the netcdfgroup archives: