Re: [ldm-users] Turning off RPC

• To: ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: [ldm-users] Turning off RPC
• From: Steve Emmerson <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:08:15 -0600

Tyler Allison wrote:

> Personally, I'd rather see it assume 388 and fall back to
> portmapper/rpcbind in the event of 388 failure, but that's just me :)

That's the way the LDM actually works.

Accessing the portmapper (port 111) is only an issue if and when access
to port 388 is blocked for some reason (e.g., a firewall rule).

Regards,
Steve Emmerson
LDM Developer

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [ldm-users] Turning off RPC
    • From: Tyler Allison

• References:
  • [ldm-users] Turning off RPC
    • From: Peter Laws
  • Re: [ldm-users] Turning off RPC
    • From: Peter Laws
  • Re: [ldm-users] Turning off RPC
    • From: Bret Whissel
  • Re: [ldm-users] Turning off RPC
    • From: Tyler Allison