Re: As you probably have seen by now...

Steven Danz wrote:
Could it depend on the time zone of the LDM server? All systems here run in UTC and we didn't see the problem.


I don't think so... My servers run on GMT-6 (Central standard/daylight time), and they are fine so far. I'm not saving any data on a 6.6.4 box though, all of my boxes saving data are 6.6.3 or older.


Gerry Creager wrote:
Just had a chance to look at one of the systems here (where I'm most concerned with DDS|IDS, and we're not seeing the problem here, either. (

Interesting problem. I hate tracking them when they don't fail the same on all systems...


Pete Pokrandt wrote:
Steve Emmerson wrote:

I'm working on the problem.

--Steve Emmerson
Steve (and others)

For what it's worth, I've got two 6.6.3 machines here at UW-Madison (f5 and that are NOT exhibiting this problem. All of my data so far as I can tell are being filed with the correct date. For example

DDS|IDS ^S[AP].* .... ([0-3][0-9])([0-2][0-9]) FILE /usr/local/ldm/data/weather/(\1:yy)(\1:mm)\1\2.METAR
is filing correctly.

One is a Centos 4.4 x86_64 box and the other is a Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 3 (Taroon Update 8)
Let me know if you'd like more details, or access to poke around.


Daryl Herzmann wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Harry Edmon wrote:

I am not seeing this. Are they being filed as 20070631, 20070701, or what?

20070631 , it is happening here too with LDM 6.6.4 :(


^ Pete Pokrandt                    V 1447  AOSS Bldg  1225 W Dayton St^
^ Systems Programmer               V Madison,         WI     53706    ^
^                                  V       poker@xxxxxxxxxxxx         ^
^ Dept of Atmos & Oceanic Sciences V (608) 262-3086 (Phone/voicemail) ^
^ University of Wisconsin-Madison  V (608) 262-0166 (Fax)             ^

  • 2007 messages navigation, sorted by:
    1. Thread
    2. Subject
    3. Author
    4. Date
    5. ↑ Table Of Contents
  • Search the ldm-users archives: