Re: As you probably have seen by now...

Just had a chance to look at one of the systems here (where I'm most concerned with DDS|IDS, and we're not seeing the problem here, either. (sasquatch.tamu.edu)

Interesting problem. I hate tracking them when they don't fail the same on all systems...

gerry

Pete Pokrandt wrote:
Steve Emmerson wrote:
Everyone,

I'm working on the problem.

--Steve Emmerson
Steve (and others)

For what it's worth, I've got two 6.6.3 machines here at UW-Madison (f5 and weather.aos.wisc.edu) that are NOT exhibiting this problem. All of my data so far as I can tell are being filed with the correct date. For example

DDS|IDS ^S[AP].* .... ([0-3][0-9])([0-2][0-9]) FILE /usr/local/ldm/data/weather/(\1:yy)(\1:mm)\1\2.METAR
is filing correctly.

One is a Centos 4.4 x86_64 box and the other is a Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 3 (Taroon Update 8)
Let me know if you'd like more details, or access to poke around.

Pete


Daryl Herzmann wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Harry Edmon wrote:

I am not seeing this. Are they being filed as 20070631, 20070701, or what?

20070631 , it is happening here too with LDM 6.6.4 :(

daryl

--
Gerry Creager -- gerry.creager@xxxxxxxx
Texas Mesonet -- AATLT, Texas A&M University        
Cell: 979.229.5301 Office: 979.458.4020 FAX: 979.862.3983
Office: 1700 Research Parkway Ste 160, TAMU, College Station, TX 77843



  • 2007 messages navigation, sorted by:
    1. Thread
    2. Subject
    3. Author
    4. Date
    5. ↑ Table Of Contents
  • Search the ldm-users archives: