Couldn't you just put a pattern of KWAL in before the existing one with an
action of NOOP?
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <owner-ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Paul L. Sirvatka <sirvatka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Steve Emmerson <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; LDM-USERS
<ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sat Apr 21 16:40:00 2007
Subject: Re: Questions concerning pqact
Paul,
Steve's regular expression, as he gave in his previous email, does ask
that the *first* character be a K but your original regex only showed
(K...). Steve's REGEX will work if you are asking for patterns
*beginning* with 'K' and followed by three letters or numbers, with the
exception of (^KWAL). Maybe this assumption is okay, but just wanted to
double-check.
-Donna
Steve Emmerson wrote:
> Paul,
>
> The following extended regular expression will match any 4 characters
> but "KWAL":
>
> ([^K]...|K[^W]..|KW[^A].|KWA[^L])
>
> Regards,
> Steve Emmerson
>
> ===============================================================================
>
>
> To unsubscribe ldm-users, visit:
> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing-list-delete-form.html
> ===============================================================================
>
>
--
Donna Cote
Senior Research Associate
The Academy for Advanced Telecommunications and Learning Technologies
Texas A&M University
3139 TAMU
College Station, Texas 77843-3139
Office: (979) 862-3982
Cell: (979) 324-3549
Fax: (979) 862-3983
===============================================================================
To unsubscribe ldm-users, visit:
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing-list-delete-form.html
===============================================================================
