Re: [gembud] Using GEMPAK for Real-time exercise

  • To: daryl herzmann <akrherz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gembud] Using GEMPAK for Real-time exercise
  • From: "Pettee, Warren" <wpettee@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 21:04:08 +0000
  • Authentication-results:; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;

Thanks for the reply, the directory has been setup with the naming and 
directory conventions followed. I didn't actually use any of the case data, 
only a few archive files from our local TDWR site. I've had issues before with 
our local TDWR data, so I am completely willing to believe GEMPAK is not the 
issue. I was more wondering if the NCDC level 3 works natively at all which, 
judging by everyone's response, it does.


Warren Pettee
Undergraduate - Meteorology
Department of Geography and Earth Sciences
University of North Carolina at Charlotte
9201 University City Blvd, Charlotte, NC 28223
wpettee@xxxxxxxx | 336.257.9239

From: daryl herzmann <akrherz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 4:33 PM
To: Pettee, Warren
Cc: gembud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gembud] Using GEMPAK for Real-time exercise

On Tue, 28 Apr 2015, Pettee, Warren wrote:

> On another note, does NCDC archived level 3 data require decoding? The
> files I have attempted to load are not working natively with GEMPAK
> (Previous experience says level 2 should work fine).

It should just-work(tm).  Did you rename the files to properly match the
directory structure and file naming that GEMPAK expects?

For example:

$ ls $RAD/NIDS/DMX/N0R/N0R_20150428_2028


  * Daryl Herzmann
  * Assistant Scientist -- Iowa Environmental Mesonet

  • 2015 messages navigation, sorted by:
    1. Thread
    2. Subject
    3. Author
    4. Date
    5. ↑ Table Of Contents
  • Search the gembud archives: