Due to the current gap in continued funding from the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF), the NSF Unidata Program Center has temporarily paused most operations. See NSF Unidata Pause in Most Operations for details.
Due to the current gap in continued funding from the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF), the NSF Unidata Program Center has temporarily paused most operations. See NSF Unidata Pause in Most Operations for details.
Pete,Thanks for your suggestion. I was indeed using the "gif" driver, but when I use the "gf" driver instead I get similar results as I show below. The main thing I'm having trouble figuring out is why this won't plot correctly in GEMPAK5.10.2, while it works fine in GEMPAK5.9.2.
In my previous examples I was using gif, now I use the gf driver: (DEVICE = gf|OUTPUTFILE|800;600)
GEMPAK5.9.2, using SFMAP: TEXT= .7: http://www.met.sjsu.edu/weather/surface/24hour-e.gif TEXT=1/21/SW: http://www.met.sjsu.edu/weather/surface/24hour-f.gif BUT, GEMPAK5.10.2, using SFMAP: TEXT= .7: http://www.met.sjsu.edu/weather/surface/24hour-g.gif TEXT=1/21/SW: http://www.met.sjsu.edu/weather/surface/24hour-h.gif Anyone? At 08:00 PM 8/12/2007, pmanousos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi Mike..The only thing I can think of offhand is be sure the driver is set to gf instead of gif.For example device = gf|test.gif instead of device = gif|test.gif The "gif" driver (not "gf") will not accept hw fonts. Pete
gembud archives: