Due to the current gap in continued funding from the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF), the NSF Unidata Program Center has temporarily paused most operations. See NSF Unidata Pause in Most Operations for details.
NOTE: The cf-satellite
mailing list is no longer active. The list archives are made available for historical reasons.
Jim,I was lurking on the telecon yesterday. At NSIDC we work with satellite-based passive microwave swath data. "Line" and "sample" terminology would work fine for these.
Mary Jo ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Mary Jo Brodzik, Special Projects Lead, 303-492-8263 NSIDC/CIRES, Univ. of Colo. at Boulder, 449 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309-0449 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ On Fri, 15 Jul 2011, Jim Biard wrote:
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 08:59:00 -0400 From: Jim Biard <Jim.Biard@xxxxxxxx> To: cf-satellite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [cf-satellite] Proposal for naming convention for swath dimensionsI suggested in the ESIP Federation CF-Satellite discussion yesterday (July 14, 2011) that the names "line" and "sample" could be good candidates for the names of the geometrical dimensions of swath data variables. I think that these are more generic than previous suggestions, and accommodate a wider range of data acquisition schemes. There can be sensors out there for which even these names are "incorrect", but the vast majority of the data is produced as a raster of some sort. This is common terminology in many other arenas (photogrammetry, for example).-- Jim Biard Government Contractor, STG Inc. Remote Sensing and Applications Division (RSAD) National Climatic Data Center 151 Patton Ave. Asheville, NC 28801-5001 jim.biard@xxxxxxxx 828-271-4900 _______________________________________________ cf-satellite mailing list cf-satellite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxFor list information or to unsubscribe, visit: http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/
cf-satellite
archives: