John Graybeal wrote:
Was there something wrong with the term 'profile'? I thought
that was reasonable. Some profiles will not be regular, and I
think that's OK.
Yes, "profile" is correct, there were some places i inadvertantly
used "profiler". Just wondering if there was a better generic name.
Re the Z axis, it would be nice to know for sure whether the Z
axis should be interpreted as 'surface'. (Other possible
surfaces exist, and I suppose an abstract form of Z is also
possible. So if we want determinism, we could either say "lack of
characterization always means surface" or "Z must be described, if
only to say it is 'surface'.")
Yes, after thinking more about it, Im not so sure we should allow
data that doesnt have a z coordinate. A standard I think should be
allowed to insist on things like this.
At 9:19 PM -0700 9/17/07, McCann, Mike wrote:
- "profiler" in the atmospheric community is used
extensively for the
name of an instrument that produces "profiles". I would recommend
changing your "profiler" to "profile" to remove this confusion. A
RAOB sounding is a profile, but people do not refer to the
as a profiler necessarily.
ok. anyone with a better name is welcome to offer it. What is
"data that has an array of values along the vertical dimension"?
For oceanographic moorings we have "profile" data, such as what comes
from an Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler, and data that we call "string"
data such as what comes from a series of instruments (CTDs, Radiometers)
mounted on a vertical rope or wire beneath the buoy.
Profile data is usually stored on a regularly spaced Z-axis and string
data is stored on an irregular Z-axis as the depths are often like 1, 10,
20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 150, 200, 250, and 300 meters.
Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute
7700 Sandholdt Road
Moss Landing, CA 95039-9644
Voice: (831) 775-1769 Fax: (831) 775-1646 http://www.mbari.org
cf-pointobsconvention mailing list
For list information or to unsubscribe, visit: