Re: [galeon] WCS CF-netCDF profile document

• To: Unidata GALEON <galeon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: [galeon] WCS CF-netCDF profile document
• From: John Caron <caron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2008 07:35:09 -0600

Lawrence, BN (Bryan) wrote:

Then, once we talk about coverages conforming to some data model, we're really 
talking about features ... and feature servers can deliver coverages. Me, while 
I think the WCS is temporarily important, it's not going to be important for 
long!

Hi Bryan:

Is that because WCS will be replaced by a "Feature Service"? a WFS or something 
else? Can you give us any more detail on where you see we might end up?

• References:
  • [galeon] WCS CF-netCDF profile document
    • From: Stefano Nativi
  • Re: [galeon] WCS CF-netCDF profile document
    • From: Jon Blower
  • Re: [galeon] WCS CF-netCDF profile document
    • From: Peter Baumann
  • Re: [galeon] WCS CF-netCDF profile document
    • From: Steve Hankin
  • Re: [galeon] WCS CF-netCDF profile document
    • From: stefano nativi
  • Re: [galeon] WCS CF-netCDF profile document
    • From: Steve Hankin
  • Re: [galeon] WCS CF-netCDF profile document
    • From: Jon Blower
  • Re: [galeon] WCS CF-netCDF profile document
    • From: Peter Baumann
  • Re: [galeon] WCS CF-netCDF profile document
    • From: Aaron Braeckel
  • Re: [galeon] WCS CF-netCDF profile document
    • From: Steve Hankin
  • Re: [galeon] WCS CF-netCDF profile document
    • From: Jon Blower
  • Re: [galeon] WCS CF-netCDF profile document
    • From: stefano nativi
  • Re: [galeon] WCS CF-netCDF profile document
    • From: Lawrence, BN (Bryan)