Due to the current gap in continued funding from the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF), the NSF Unidata Program Center has temporarily paused most operations. See NSF Unidata Pause in Most Operations for details.
Due to the current gap in continued funding from the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF), the NSF Unidata Program Center has temporarily paused most operations. See NSF Unidata Pause in Most Operations for details.
Hi Doug, > How hard would it be to implement an aspect ratio that is independent of > the projection matrix? (Am I correct in assuming that the box is defined > by -1 to 1 and the aspect is manipulated by the transformation matrix?) Your assumption is correct. I have thought about doing what you want, because I want it too. However, there are some nasty details and I just haven't had time to attack this problem. One work around is to turn the box off using DisplayRenderer.setBoxOn(false), then to create your own box using a ScalarMap to Display.Shape. You'd also need to figure the right values for setRange() to (-1, +1) to get the range you want in your custom box. Axis scales would be tricky, although Don Murray is working on something new for them. Cheers, Bill ---------------------------------------------------------- Bill Hibbard, SSEC, 1225 W. Dayton St., Madison, WI 53706 hibbard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 608-263-4427 fax: 608-263-6738 http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/~billh/vis.html
visad archives: