Re: [thredds] TDS 4.0.9

Thanks Rich. The Unidata folk usually are very responsive. Our "problem", if you will, is that the present version 3.17.x is running very stably for what we need it to do, and only want to switch when TDS4 is reasonably stable. Ideally we would do more in-house testing, but ideally I would be rolling in money with a large and talented staff (well my staff is talented, but large we are not).

-Roy


On May 19, 2009, at 2:32 PM, Richard Signell wrote:

Roy,

We've been hitting the TDS 4 pretty hard, trying a bunch of different
types of gridded data with the Forecast Model Run Collection
aggregation.

We are using features only available in TDS4, so we need it, but we
also are not operational so we are okay working through the bugs.  The
good news is that the Unidata guys are extremely responsive, fixing
bugs usually within 24 hours.

I'd guess we have upgraded about 6-10 times in the last month.

-Rich

On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Roy Mendelssohn
<Roy.Mendelssohn@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi All:

We have TDS 4.0.9 running in-house, but have not had a lot of chance to test it. If any can answer some of these questions, I would appreciate it:

1. What quality is this considered  (alpha, beta, beta(x), rc)

2. Has anyone done a lot of testing with the OpeNDAP service with highly
time aggregated data?

3. Has anyone done a lot of testing of the WCS service with highly time aggregated data (in this past, this has at times gotten broken with new versions). Has anyone looked at Geotiff output from projected data, such as
Mercator and Albers?

4. Has anyone done much testing with the WMS service with highly time
aggregated data?


Basically, at some point we would want to switch over to TDS4, but our TDS is highly operational with a lot of data requests a day, and we need to be certain that it is reasonably stable in all the operations before we do so. And, we have been swamped so we have not been able to do much testing, but
am hoping others have had time and can share what they have
learned/experienced/etc.

Thanks,

-Roy

**********************
"The contents of this message do not reflect any position of the U.S.
Government or NOAA."
**********************
Roy Mendelssohn
Supervisory Operations Research Analyst
NOAA/NMFS
Environmental Research Division
Southwest Fisheries Science Center
1352 Lighthouse Avenue
Pacific Grove, CA 93950-2097

e-mail: Roy.Mendelssohn@xxxxxxxx (Note new e-mail address)
voice: (831)-648-9029
fax: (831)-648-8440
www: http://www.pfeg.noaa.gov/

"Old age and treachery will overcome youth and skill."
"From those who have been given much, much will be expected"

_______________________________________________
thredds mailing list
thredds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For list information or to unsubscribe,  visit:
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/




--
Dr. Richard P. Signell   (508) 457-2229
USGS, 384 Woods Hole Rd.
Woods Hole, MA 02543-1598

**********************
"The contents of this message do not reflect any position of the U.S. Government or NOAA."
**********************
Roy Mendelssohn
Supervisory Operations Research Analyst
NOAA/NMFS
Environmental Research Division
Southwest Fisheries Science Center
1352 Lighthouse Avenue
Pacific Grove, CA 93950-2097

e-mail: Roy.Mendelssohn@xxxxxxxx (Note new e-mail address)
voice: (831)-648-9029
fax: (831)-648-8440
www: http://www.pfeg.noaa.gov/

"Old age and treachery will overcome youth and skill."
"From those who have been given much, much will be expected"



  • 2009 messages navigation, sorted by:
    1. Thread
    2. Subject
    3. Author
    4. Date
    5. ↑ Table Of Contents
  • Search the thredds archives: