The only problem I have with HTML is with the particular flavor generated
by Microsoft Word and PowerPoint. Actually the newer (Mac) version seems
to do a better job, but Word 2000 generates impenetrable HTML. Those are
the cases where we prefer to create PDFs. We're looking into whether Word
XP does a better job of creating web pages.
--On Tuesday, May 14, 2002 8:16 AM -0500 Tom Whittaker <tomw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Even better, in my opinion, would be HTML...
On Mon, 13 May 2002, Ben Domenico wrote:
Another alternative that works for us is PDF if you have a full version
of Acrobat to create it. You can't edit it, but you do get the
pictures and the nice layout.
--On Monday, May 13, 2002 1:15 PM -0500 Christopher Klaus
> Hi Robert,
> Thanks for pointing that out! I just submitted text versions of the
> word documents. While lacking nice pictures, they retain the
> information for using these capabilities.
> Hope this helps,
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Space Science and Eng. Center