Well, I build with f03 support and compile against openmpi, hdf5,
parallel-netcdf.
So you will/should not have any problems. :)
2015-05-29 17:42 GMT+02:00 Carl Ponder <cponder@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> *On 05/29/2015 10:35 AM, Nick Papior Andersen wrote:*
>
> Netcdf fortran prefers the f03 module over the f90 module. They contain
> the same interface, but f03 does so with iso_c_binding.
>
> As you are required to link against the same compiler (if you use the
> module) you should not see any shortcomings of not having f90 modules
> (everything you need is in the f03 modules). The only difference is how the
> module is build and not what interfaces exist.
> Please, if the devs note that I am saying something wrong, please correct
> :)
>
> Is there a particular reason why you want f90 and not f03?
>
> I'm trying to build the NetCDF and other components (like OpenMPI &
> HDF5) with as many of the capabilities enabled as I can.
> I think this is the info that I wanted, I'll stick with the F03 unless I
> see problems show up.
> Thanks,
>
> Carl
>
>
> ------------------------------
> This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and
> may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use,
> disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies
> of the original message.
> ------------------------------
>
--
Kind regards Nick
