Due to the current gap in continued funding from the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF), the NSF Unidata Program Center has temporarily paused most operations. See NSF Unidata Pause in Most Operations for details.
Due to the current gap in continued funding from the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF), the NSF Unidata Program Center has temporarily paused most operations. See NSF Unidata Pause in Most Operations for details.
There is a Google Group where we have been discussing this: http://groups.google.com/group/ugrid-interoperability -Rich On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:10 AM, <hengkek@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Dear fellow netcdf users > > We are looking for "best practices" for a netcdf convention for unstructured > grids, a la, ADCIRC, ELCIRC, FVCOM, SELFE. We hope to find some pointers, > insights and advice from this forum. > > I've gone through Russ Rew's archived email below: > http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/archives/netcdfgroup/2009/msg00088.html > > From the links in Russ's email and limited googling, it appears that this is > a somewhat "difficult" area and that there's not much available info after > 2006. > > However, what would currently be the "de facto" netcdf standard/convention > to use for unstructured grids? > Might there be a group that may be working towards the "one ring to rule > them all" convention? > > We're looking for a convention that is (among other things): > 1. Generally recognised by visualization software. > 2. Allows for convenient extraction of boundary condition data. > > We'd be grateful for any advice/pointers. > > regards > -hengkek > Tropical Marine Science Institute > Singapore > > _______________________________________________ > netcdfgroup mailing list > netcdfgroup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > For list information or to unsubscribe, visit: > http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/ -- Dr. Richard P. Signell (508) 457-2229 USGS, 384 Woods Hole Rd. Woods Hole, MA 02543-1598
netcdfgroup archives: