Due to the current gap in continued funding from the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF), the NSF Unidata Program Center has temporarily paused most operations. See NSF Unidata Pause in Most Operations for details.
Due to the current gap in continued funding from the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF), the NSF Unidata Program Center has temporarily paused most operations. See NSF Unidata Pause in Most Operations for details.
Aaron, The NetCDF's intention was to use the single mimetype to cover both versions and make the version an transparent detail. Since the NetCDF library (and NetCDF-java) handle the different versions transparently, I'm curious: what is your use case for continuing to return netcdf 3 files? Ryan On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Aaron Braeckel <braeckel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello, > > an earlier thread was asking about the official netCDF mime type: > http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/archives/netcdf-java/2013/msg00128.html. > This is pretty straightforward, but not as clear when it relates to netCDF > 4. I use web services that need to both advertise file formats through a > mime type as well as allow for data to be requested in a variety of formats > through a mime type. Is there a suggested way of discriminating between > netCDF 3 and 4 through mime types? > > Aaron > > > > _______________________________________________ > netcdf-java mailing list > netcdf-java@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > For list information or to unsubscribe, visit: > http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/ > -- Ryan May Software Engineer UCAR/Unidata Boulder, CO
netcdf-java archives: