Thanks for hint.
I'm also aware about performance issue.
But anyway first of all I need ability to save large files from Java...
Do you have any clue about how much it will be slower comparing to native "C" ?
Cheers,
Mark Balonkin
-----Original Message-----
From: netcdf-java-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:netcdf-java-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of lyng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: 11 декабря 2008 г. 16:42
To: netcdf-java@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [netcdf-java] NetCDF-java 4.0 release?
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 Mark Balonkin wrote:
> We are thinking about implementation of java wrapper on "C" netcdf library.
> Basically because we need large file support and also would be good to have
> better performance. We don't need the whole functionality, just a basic
> writing. But anyway it's still a bunch of work.
If you're looking for better performance putting a "C" code in a Java wrapper
is not the way to go. You will be disappointed in the performance of this
approach. It is also extremely difficult to debug.
_______________________________________________
netcdf-java mailing list
netcdf-java@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For list information or to unsubscribe, visit:
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/
