Re: 20041123: netcdf-java


Subject: BOUNCE netcdf-hdf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: Non-member submission from ["Ian F. Darwin" <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] Organization: UCAR/Unidata
Keywords: 200411232127.iANLRcTN021065

From support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Tue Nov 23 14:27:36 2004
Received: from mail.phenogenomics.ca ([192.75.158.218])
        by unidata.ucar.edu (UCAR/Unidata) with ESMTP id iANLRZ7j021057
        for <netcdf-hdf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 14:27:36 -0700 (MST)
Organization: UCAR/Unidata
Keywords: 200411232127.iANLRZ7j021057
Received: from [172.16.1.104] ([172.16.1.104])
        (authenticated bits=0)
        by mail.phenogenomics.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iANLRK9N002666;
        Tue, 23 Nov 2004 16:27:20 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <88E8150A-3D96-11D9-91E8-000393073EF6@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "Ian F. Darwin" <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Ian F. Darwin" <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: netcdf-java
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 16:27:53 -0500
To: netcdf-hdf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619)

As a Java developer I was happy to stumble across the web site for netcdf-java today.

However I was a tiny bit concerned that the netcdf-java page describes version 2.1 as "a prototype for the NetCDF-4 project". Prototypes in some meanings of the word tend to be things that are developed and then discarded. Can you please comment on the medium-term viability of netcdf-java, that is, will it continue to be developed in parallel with NetCDF-4, or will its maintenance come to an end with the release of the C version?

Thanks very much for your answer to this all-important question:-)

Ian Darwin
Toronto Center for Phenogenomics (phenogenomics.ca)
ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hi Ian:

The netCDF Java library is fully supported Unidata software; its not going away!

The sense of "prototype" that I intended was simply that various design ideas are being tried out in the Java library, with eventual migration to the C library as they prove useful and resources are available. As such, the APIs are a bit more fluid than the C library. It will probably stay rather ahead of the C library development for the forseeable future. The latest version is 2.2.

thanks for your interest.