Due to the current gap in continued funding from the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF), the NSF Unidata Program Center has temporarily paused most operations. See NSF Unidata Pause in Most Operations for details.
Due to the current gap in continued funding from the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF), the NSF Unidata Program Center has temporarily paused most operations. See NSF Unidata Pause in Most Operations for details.
NOTE: The netcdf-hdf mailing list is no longer active. The list archives are made available for historical reasons.
Hi, I wrote: > Currently, each netCDF dimension must have a unique name. There are > several reasons for this: ... > 4. To distinguish between dimensions that happen to have the same > length but that are intended to represent distinct dimensions. > If two variable's dimensions are not related, we recommend > creating separate dimensions for them, even if they happen to > have the same length. In rereading this after I posted it, I realize it's not really a valid reason to require names for dimensions. Distinct anonymous dimensions that happen to have the same length are still distinct and presumably distinguishable ... --Russ
netcdf-hdf archives: