Due to the current gap in continued funding from the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF), the NSF Unidata Program Center has temporarily paused most operations. See NSF Unidata Pause in Most Operations for details.
NOTE: The netcdf-hdf
mailing list is no longer active. The list archives are made available for historical reasons.
> Ed Hartnett wrote: > > >John Caron <caron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > > > > >>2. So, generally I like your Dimension Scale proposal. The main things > >>we need are 1) shared Dimensions even when theres not a coordinate > >>variable (perhaps a Dimension Scale without the values?), 2) each > >> > >> > > > >I wonder, though, why we need this in HDF. > > > >If we have a shared dimension without coordinate values, how is that > >different from an unshared dimension without coordinate values (which > >is what HDF currently provides?) > > > > > >Ed > > > > > we need shared dimensions: almost all higher level Conventions rely on > them. they dont always rely on them for just coordinate variables. > Generalizarions of coordinate variables also need shared dimensions, but > cannot use coordinate variables. "ditto" :-) Quincey
netcdf-hdf
archives: