I neglected to mention that our feed is IDD, which was relevant. The 06Z
cycle from overnight seems pretty complete. I'm cautiously optimistic that
this can be attributed to network issues in CP.
Thanks for the replies!
Matt
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 8:14 PM Pete Pokrandt <poker@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Our files for the NAM on the 212 grid coming through on the NOAAport feed
> were definitely smaller recently - some I'm sure due to the internet issues
> at NCEP/College Park
>
> -rw-r--r--. 1 ldm ldm 832219484 Mar 28 21:43
> NAM_CONUS_12km_20210329_0000.grib2
> -rw-r--r--. 1 ldm ldm 829723435 Mar 29 03:44
> NAM_CONUS_12km_20210329_0600.grib2
> -rw-r--r--. 1 ldm ldm 827896277 Mar 29 09:41
> NAM_CONUS_12km_20210329_1200.grib2
> -rw-r--r--. 1 ldm ldm 830164459 Mar 29 15:47
> NAM_CONUS_12km_20210329_1800.grib2
> -rw-r--r--. 1 ldm ldm 834221703 Mar 29 21:43
> NAM_CONUS_12km_20210330_0000.grib2
> -rw-r--r--. 1 ldm ldm 532599250 Mar 30 06:11
> NAM_CONUS_12km_20210330_0600.grib2
> -rw-r--r--. 1 ldm ldm 831254618 Mar 30 09:55
> NAM_CONUS_12km_20210330_1200.grib2
> -rw-r--r--. 1 ldm ldm 719643197 Mar 30 18:39
> NAM_CONUS_12km_20210330_1800.grib2
> -rw-r--r--. 1 ldm ldm 837102608 Mar 30 21:43
> NAM_CONUS_12km_20210331_0000.grib2
> -rw-r--r--. 1 ldm ldm 833196536 Mar 31 03:54
> NAM_CONUS_12km_20210331_0600.grib2
> -rw-r--r--. 1 ldm ldm 496486714 Mar 31 10:37
> NAM_CONUS_12km_20210331_1200.grib2
>
> The data that came through on the CONDUIT feed seems complete for today's
> 12 UTC run, so not sure what was different..
>
> -rw-r--r--. 1 ldm ldm 1634076346 Mar 28 21:40
> NAM_CONUS_12km_conduit_20210329_0000.grib2
> -rw-r--r--. 1 ldm ldm 1640965999 Mar 29 03:39
> NAM_CONUS_12km_conduit_20210329_0600.grib2
> -rw-r--r--. 1 ldm ldm 1646434356 Mar 29 09:39
> NAM_CONUS_12km_conduit_20210329_1200.grib2
> -rw-r--r--. 1 ldm ldm 1635438098 Mar 29 15:40
> NAM_CONUS_12km_conduit_20210329_1800.grib2
> -rw-r--r--. 1 ldm ldm 1629058420 Mar 29 21:40
> NAM_CONUS_12km_conduit_20210330_0000.grib2
> -rw-r--r--. 1 ldm ldm 1641860348 Mar 30 05:37
> NAM_CONUS_12km_conduit_20210330_0600.grib2
> -rw-r--r--. 1 ldm ldm 498966697 Mar 30 09:51
> NAM_CONUS_12km_conduit_20210330_1200.grib2
> -rw-r--r--. 1 ldm ldm 1655766185 Mar 30 15:38
> NAM_CONUS_12km_conduit_20210330_1800.grib2
> -rw-r--r--. 1 ldm ldm 1647680739 Mar 30 21:40
> NAM_CONUS_12km_conduit_20210331_0000.grib2
> -rw-r--r--. 1 ldm ldm 1654721766 Mar 31 03:39
> NAM_CONUS_12km_conduit_20210331_0600.grib2
> -rw-r--r--. 1 ldm ldm 1665522733 Mar 31 09:40
> NAM_CONUS_12km_conduit_20210331_1200.grib2
>
> For what it's worth..
>
> Pete
>
>
>
> <http://www.weather.com/tv/shows/wx-geeks/video/the-incredible-shrinking-cold-pool>
> -----
> Pete Pokrandt - Systems Programmer
> UW-Madison Dept of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences
> 608-262-3086 - poker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* ldm-users <ldm-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of
> Matthew Foster - NOAA Federal via ldm-users <ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 31, 2021 3:01 PM
> *To:* LDM <ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Subject:* [ldm-users] Missing grid data today
>
> Has anyone else experienced a significant amount of missing grid data (at
> least) today? I noticed that I missed quite a bit of NAM (GRID218) data
> from today's 12Z cycle, and I'm not sure why. I checked our latency, and we
> had a few spikes up to a few minutes, but that's it. I see quite a few
> entries in my ldmd.log file showing primary/alternate transfer-mode
> switches. Is that normal?
>
> Thanks for any input.
>
> Matt
>
> --
> Matt Foster, Science & Operations Officer
> NWS Operations Proving Ground
> 7220 NW 101st Terrace
> Kansas City, MO 64153
> Office: 816-994-3072
> https://weather.gov/opg
> Follow us on Twitter @nwsopg
>
>
--
Matt Foster, Science & Operations Officer
NWS Operations Proving Ground
7220 NW 101st Terrace
Kansas City, MO 64153
Office: 816-994-3072
https://weather.gov/opg
Follow us on Twitter @nwsopg
