Due to the current gap in continued funding from the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF), the NSF Unidata Program Center has temporarily paused most operations. See NSF Unidata Pause in Most Operations for details.
Hi David, Yes it is. GOES-16 is much faster via NOAAport, but with GOES-15, a delay like that is normal. Gilbert Gilbert Sebenste Staff Meteorologist Environmental Health and Safety Labs for Wellness 154 | DeKalb, Illinois 60115 815-753-5492 gilbert@xxxxxxx<mailto:gilbert@xxxxxxx> http://weather.admin.niu.edu<http://weather.admin.niu.edu/> Everyone. Home. Safely. [NIU] From: ldm-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ldm-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David Fitzgerald Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 11:27 AM To: 'ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' <ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [ldm-users] uniwisc feed receive times Hi Everyone, We have noticed that our UNIWISC feeds seem to be running up to 30 minutes behind the product creation time. Our weather station people are annoyed the imagery is so late. For example, the line shown below is from an `ldmadmin watch -f UNIWISC` command showing a GOES-13 image: 20170328T141114.365590Z pqutil[29006] INFO pqutil.c:1181:display_watch() 741505 20170328141111.455496 UNIWISC 000 pnga2area Q3 UE 1231 GOES-13_IMG 13.3um 4km 20170328 1345 This shows we got the image at 1411, and was sent to us from our upstream site only a few seconds earlier. But the image time is for 1345. Is anyone else seeing this, and is this a normal lag between image creation and dissemination? Dave ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ David Fitzgerald Information Technology Millersville University Millersville, PA 17551 Phone: 717-871-7436 E-Mail: david.fitzgerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:david.fitzgerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
ldm-users
archives: