[ldm-users] 20080216: Nexrad Level 3 (cont.)

Hi Tyler,

re:
>Since my system looks to be mimic'ing Jeff's I can chime in and say that
>it is definitely not IO related with my L3 system.
>
>My queue file is running in a memory based file system with the entire
>queue loaded into memory via a tmpfs file system.  That completely
>eliminates the IO issue you would see with placing the queue on disk.
>
>The only IO hit I take is when taking the data out of queue and writing to
>disk which is dedicated to LDM data. I have no downstream feeds.

This information eliminates I/O bottleneck concerns from your machine,
at least.

>pqmon shows max age of 6902 which leads me to believe the queue size is
>plenty big.

Yup, I agree.

>There has got to be an intermittent upstream issue somewhere. Those are
>always the worst ones to troubleshoot!

Given the latencies seen (excluding round-trip or recirculated
products), I would imagine that the problem is at the source -- when
the products are broadcast in NOAAPort.  This view is buoyed by an ADM
message that Darryl Herzmann sent along a little bit ago:

  NOUS72 KNCF 111452
  ADMNCF
  THE NWSTG IS EXPERIENCING TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES WITH A FRONT END
  PROCESSOR.  THEY ARE TROUBLSHOOTING THE ISSUE AND HOPE TO HAVE
  THE PROBLEM RESOLVED IN A TIMELY FASHION.  THANK YOU FOR YOUR
  PATIENCE.

Enough fun for tonight ;-)

Cheers,

Tom
--
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
* Tom Yoksas                                            UCAR Unidata Program *
* (303) 497-8642 (last resort)                                 P.O. Box 3000 *
* yoksas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                                  Boulder, CO 80307 *
* Unidata WWW Service                            http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/*
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+


  • 2008 messages navigation, sorted by:
    1. Thread
    2. Subject
    3. Author
    4. Date
    5. ↑ Table Of Contents
  • Search the ldm-users archives: