This is what I was just going to say. I do this all the time with multiple
entries. It works fine. I am sure the programmers out there have
a more esoteric and aesthetically pleasing way of doing it, but it's
real hard to mess up this way and real easy to change.
Robert
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 12:48 PM
Cc: ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Patrick,
You can have multiple entries in pqact.conf for the same data. For
example, I file my NNEXRAD data in one directory, but I also save the KIND
files in another directory for a student who works at WFO Indianapolis.
You can see how easily it is done...
#Save data from KIND
NNEXRAD ^SDUS[1-9][1-9] (KIND) .* /p(...)(IND)
FILE /project/ldm/www/ind_nid/%y%m%d%H%MKIND.\2
#Base Reflectivity, tilt 1 (.50 degrees)
NNEXRAD ^SDUS[1-9][1-9] (K...) .* /p(N0R)(...)
FILE /project/ldm/data/nids/%y%m%d%H%MK\3.bref1
I'm sure there are other ways to do it, but this is the simplest that I
know of.
Ben
====================
Benjamin J. Cotton
LDM/Forecast Game Administrator
Dept of Earth and Atmos. Sci.
Purdue University
bcotton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(765)743-6083 (502)551-5403
www.eas.purdue.edu/~bcotton
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Patrick O'Reilly wrote:
> I am decoding/filing all HDS feed data in a ~ldm/data/gempak/model
> directory. I am getting the full HDS feed. I want to decode/file only
> certain few grids in a seperate directory, and have thought of a couple
ways
> to do this, but wanted to see what others might be doing, as it's likely
> simpler than what I have in mind. I imagine some of you are doing this
> exact thing.
>
> To summarize, I want to decode and send all grid data to
> ~ldm/data/gempak/model, but want to send a subset of this feed to another
> directory as well. Anyone doing this and have suggestions?
>
> Patrick
> _______________________________________
> Patrick O'Reilly
> Meteorological Decision Support Scientist
> The STORM Project - University of Northern Iowa
> patrick.oreilly@xxxxxxx ~ ph: 319-273-3789
> http://www.uni.edu/storm
>
> "No trees were killed in the making of this e-mail...however,
> a large number of electrons were horribly inconvenienced."
>
>
