Due to the current gap in continued funding from the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF), the NSF Unidata Program Center has temporarily paused most operations. See NSF Unidata Pause in Most Operations for details.
Due to the current gap in continued funding from the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF), the NSF Unidata Program Center has temporarily paused most operations. See NSF Unidata Pause in Most Operations for details.
Gilbert, >Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 09:45:09 -0500 (CDT) >From: Gilbert Sebenste <sebenste@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >To: Steve Emmerson <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Subject: Re: Question/possible bug on LDM 6.011 The above message contained the following: > Rats. I'm sorry, I forgot. Well, to be honest...there's nothing to see. > Basically, the LDM logs looked normal through the entire event (they got > erased last night). No errors, nothing to indicate that things had gone > wrong, except for the fact that data had stopped coming in. There should have been entries from exiting, receiving LDM sub-processes on why they exited. Such entries might have been useful. If you're keeping only one days worth of log files, then I suggest that you increase that number. With all our testing, we keep 14 log files around. I believe the default number is 4. Regards, Steve Emmerson
ldm-users archives: