Our lab system is also a P II, 400MHz - about three years old, but we're
seeing no problems on our four channel system feeding two other LDM
servers..
all four channels on a 100Mbit network. We have, for testing purposes,
tested eight channels on this same NRS (duplicating all four) . . . it
really
depends on the implementation and code base.
A "w" (equivalent to "uptime") on our box:
[pdinrs@lithium pdinrs]$ w
12:08am up 2 days, 6:22, 3 users, load average: 0.01, 0.03, 0.05
With low LDM and NRS latency:
Local Max Latency (seconds) | Local Average Latency (seconds)
NWSTG 43 | 0
GOESEast 2 | 0
GOESWest 2 | 0
DCP 4 | 0
Of course, this is network dependent - mileage will vary.
----- Original Message -----
Cc: <ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 2:57 PM
> I suspect that this is the case. Our NOAAPORT box
> is only a single CPU 400MHz PII. It is pretty
> taxed. This could be the problem.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Vietor [mailto:devo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 2:51 PM
> To: 'Robert Mullenax'
> Subject: RE: 120 hour AVN
>
>
> We got the AVN 213 grid to 120 hours. So it was sent.
>
> BTW, we are experiencing problems with the amount of data flow on
> NOAAPORT. The additional model and NIDS data is overtaxing our 4-port
> NOAAPORT system and I'm working on this. I have resolved most of the
> problem on our end but it may be affecting other NOAAPORT systems. I
> wonder if this is what you are seeing??
>
> ________________________________________________________
> Daniel Vietor Mail: devo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unisys Corp Title: Engineer/Meteorologist
> 221 Gale Lane Phone: 610-925-5206
> Kennett Square PA 19348 Fax: 610-925-5215
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:owner-ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Robert Mullenax
> > Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 2:39 PM
> > To: 'Jim Koermer'
> > Cc: 'ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
> > Subject: RE: 120 hour AVN
> >
> >
> > Hmm..very strange. We have a NOAAPORT SDI, so I am not
> > sure what to think. I did not notice a problem
> > with our ldm..
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jim Koermer [mailto:koermer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 1:41 PM
> > To: Robert Mullenax
> > Subject: Re: 120 hour AVN
> >
> >
> > Robert,
> >
> > We received 120-HR AVN data today--I'm able to generate maps. I wasn't
> > even aware that it was coming.
> >
> > Jim
> >
> > Robert Mullenax wrote:
> > >
> > > Did anyone get the 120-hour AVN (Grid 213) from NOAAPORT
> > this morning
> > (12Z
> > > Run)?
> > > Ours stopped at 108, but the data flow seemed to be okay.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Robert
> > >
> > > Robert Mullenax
> > > Weather Systems Administrator
> > > Universal Weather and Aviation
> >
> > --
> > James P. Koermer E-Mail: koermer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Professor of Meteorology Office Phone: (603)535-2574
> > Natural Science Department Office Fax: (603)535-2723
> > Plymouth State College WWW: http://vortex.plymouth.edu/
> > Plymouth, NH 03264
> >
>
>
