Re: [gembud] pqact for gfs 1deg F000-F192

  • To: Michael James <mjames@xxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gembud] pqact for gfs 1deg F000-F192
  • From: Neil Smith <neils@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 17:52:50 -0500
Thanks Michael.
Thing is, I’m not getting the gfs003.gem file from the CONDUIT feed.  But I am 
getting the gfs703.gem file — which did or did not replace the -F192 gfs003 
product in CONDUIT?  And using that very ERE.

Using:
ldm 6.12.6, GEMPAK7

On Sep 10, 2014, at 5:42 PM, Michael James <mjames@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Neil,
> 
> CONDUIT prod/gfs.*pgrb[^2]
> 
>         PIPE    dcgrib2 -d data/gempak/logs/dcgrib2_CONDUITgfs.log
> 
>         -e GEMTBL=/home/gempak/NAWIPS/gempak/tables
> 
> 
> 
> The file $GEMTBL/grid/gribkey.tbl determines how the GEMPAK grid files are 
> written, the last for the 0.5 degree split out by forecast hour.
> 
> 007   x   077,81,96 002    data/gempak/model/gfs/YYYYMMDDHH_gfs@@@.gem    9000
> 
> 007   x   077,81,96 003    data/gempak/model/gfs/YYYYMMDDHH_gfs003.gem   29000
> 
> 007   x   077,81,96 004    data/gempak/model/gfs0.5deg/YYYYMMDDHHfFFF_gfs.gem 
>   29000
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Michael James
> Unidata Program Center
> Boulder, CO
> 
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Neil Smith <neils@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> What is a pqact entry for the gfs 1deg F000-F192 decoded with dcgrib2?
> 
> I’ve succeeded in thoroughly confusing myself and now I don’t know which way 
> is up.
> 
> -Neil
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gembud mailing list
> gembud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For list information or to unsubscribe,  visit: 
> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gembud mailing list
> gembud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For list information or to unsubscribe,  visit: 
> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/