[galeon] Fwd: [WCS.RWG] "abstract spec" vs "XXX common"

• To: "Unidata GALEON" <galeon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: [galeon] Fwd: [WCS.RWG] "abstract spec" vs "XXX common"
• From: "Ben Domenico" <Ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 14:24:18 -0700

Hi all,

I'm not sure how many of you have been in on this exchange, but the end
result will be good news for GALEON.  As I interpret it, it means that OGC
members will have free access to the ISO 19123 specification because it was
developed as an OGC/ISO collaboration.  I know this has been a problem for
some of us.  I'll pass along any additional information regarding the
availability of the spec to OGC members as soon as I hear anything.

Happy New Year

-- Ben

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Roswell, Charles A. <Charles.A.Roswell@xxxxxxx>
Date: Dec 26, 2007 9:25 AM
Subject: Re: [WCS.RWG] "abstract spec" vs "XXX common"
To: Carl Reed OGC Account <creed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Steven Keens <
keens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Baumann <p.baumann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "
WCS.RWG" <wcs.rwg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Simonis <ingo.simonis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


But ISO 19123 was the result of OGC/TC211 collaboration.  Peple on both
sides have forgotten that.  I had to point out  to Olaf in Ro,me that
the ISO NWIP explicitly stated that the base document for the oproject
was the OGC Anstract Specifcaition Topic 6.

Charles