Due to the current gap in continued funding from the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF), the NSF Unidata Program Center has temporarily paused most operations. See NSF Unidata Pause in Most Operations for details.
Due to the current gap in continued funding from the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF), the NSF Unidata Program Center has temporarily paused most operations. See NSF Unidata Pause in Most Operations for details.
NOTE: The cf-satellite mailing list is no longer active. The list archives are made available for historical reasons.
No they dont contain On Mar 2, 2014 9:45 PM, "Randy Horne" <rhorne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ghansham: > > is it that your full disk product includes valid pixels off-earth ? > > very respectfully, > > randy > > > On Feb 28, 2014, at 11:05 PM, Ghansham Sangar <ghanshamsangar@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > what is your opinion about geostationary satellites where we have to cold > space all around the imaged disk and we are providing geolocation > information per pixel lat /lon as 2D lat/lon arrays. > Regards > Ghansham > On Mar 1, 2014 12:46 AM, "Jim Biard" <jbiard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Ghansam, >> >> Actually, in the satellite world (or any trajectory or swath-type case), >> it is entirely possible that you might have acquired measurements at a >> point, but the location information for that point may have been garbled or >> lost. If we don't require linkage, then we can preserve the maximum amount >> of data. >> >> Grace and peace, >> >> Jim >> >> [image: CICS-NC] <http://www.cicsnc.org/>Visit us on >> Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/cicsnc>*Jim Biard* >> *Research Scholar* >> Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites NC <http://cicsnc.org/> >> North Carolina State University <http://ncsu.edu/> >> NOAA's National Climatic Data Center <http://ncdc.noaa.gov/> >> 151 Patton Ave, Asheville, NC 28801 >> e: jbiard@xxxxxxxxxx >> o: +1 828 271 4900 >> >> >> >> >> On Feb 28, 2014, at 2:12 PM, Ghansham Sangar <ghanshamsangar@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >> hi sir >> thanks a lot for the prompt reply. >> obviously data should be missing where coordinates are missing. >> ghansham >> On Mar 1, 2014 12:22 AM, "Jim Biard" <jbiard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Ghansham, >>> >>> I would say yes, unreservedly, but others are insisting that this only >>> OK if you also have missing values in all the associated data variables. >>> >>> Grace and peace, >>> >>> Jim >>> >>> [image: CICS-NC] <http://www.cicsnc.org/>Visit us on >>> Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/cicsnc>*Jim Biard* >>> *Research Scholar* >>> Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites NC <http://cicsnc.org/> >>> North Carolina State University <http://ncsu.edu/> >>> NOAA's National Climatic Data Center <http://ncdc.noaa.gov/> >>> 151 Patton Ave, Asheville, NC 28801 >>> e: jbiard@xxxxxxxxxx >>> o: +1 828 271 4900 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Feb 28, 2014, at 12:53 PM, Ghansham Sangar <ghanshamsangar@xxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> >>> hi sir >>> Is it possible to specify missing value in auxillaery coordinate >>> variables (2-D lat/lon variables). >>> Regards >>> Ghansham >>> _______________________________________________ >>> cf-satellite mailing list >>> cf-satellite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> For list information or to unsubscribe, visit: >>> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/ >>> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ > cf-satellite mailing list > cf-satellite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > For list information or to unsubscribe, visit: > http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/ > > > > ____________________________________ > > Randy C. Horne (rhorne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) > Principal Engineer, Excalibur Laboratories Inc. > voice & fax: (321) 952.5100 > url: http://www.excaliburlabs.com > > > > >
cf-satellite archives: