[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

960812: future plans for netCDF

--MAA22040.839876245/binnie.unidata.ucar.edu

>To: address@hidden
>cc: "Larry A. Schoof" <address@hidden>
>From: "Larry A. Schoof" <address@hidden>
>Subject: future plans for netCDF
>Keywords: 199608121747.AA24109
>
> In the netCDF 2.4 User's Guide, you mention that "XDR is to be replaced by
> new software under development" and that "other desirable extensions that
> may be added include ... ability to access datasets larget than 2
> Gigabytes and multiple unlimited dimensions."  Do you have any
> specifications for these developments and approx when they will become
> part of netCDF?

We have eliminated the use of ONC XDR library in netcdf-3.0.
We are internally testing the 'C' language portion of this
and will be able alpha release that in a matter of a few weeks.
The FORTRAN interface will lag behind that maybe a month?
If you are interested, I can keep you posted.

The 2 gig change won't come for some time, as that would mean
a change in the file format. We are keeping the file format frozen
through the 3.x interface upheaval.

> I understand the performance hits one takes when the header of a netCDF
> file must be expanded to add new dimensions and variables.  We are paying
> significant penalties because our application codes typically repeat the
> ncdimdef...ncvardef...ncvarput sequence many times; with our codes being
> ported to MP machines, "many" is sometimes thousands!  We simply must do
> something about this.  Have you ever considered adding a function that
> a user could invoke to give an estimate for the size of the header and
> fixed-size data portion of the file?  netCDF could use that approximation
> to allocate space in the file, and each time ncredef is called, the sizes
> of the header and fixed-size data portion are checked to determine if any
> file copying is necessary.  This would be extremely beneficial to us.

In 3.x, we have changed the 'redef', 'endef' code so that it is much less
costly. Things are only shifted around in the file if necessary,
and the movement happens "in place", rather than copying to another file.
It will be possible once this is in the field to tweak it so that
header allocation occurs on 'block' boundaries, eg, you would start
with a mostly empty header block and only grow the file when you exceeded
this initial allocation. We won't do this change in the initial netcdf-3
release, because we need for people to be able to do byte for byte comparisons
and verify the netcdf-3 implementation. Once the new implementation has proven
itself in the field, we can tweak this.

> I ask these questions because three of the DOE National Labs (Sandia, Los
> Alamos, and Lawrence Livermore) are cooperating on a significant effort to
> define a "common data format" that will make it easier to share
> application data among the labs.  netCDF is one of the candidate formats
> being considered for the low-level API.
>
> Thanks for your consideration.

Thank you for your feedback.

-glenn

--MAA22040.839876245/binnie.unidata.ucar.edu--