[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: missed GFS 1 degree data from CONDUIT

Jerry,

All products from the new server will be unique with regard to
MD5 checksum (eg duplicating the data volume for products
already received until the tgsv32 injection is removed).

Steve Chiswell
Unidata User Support


On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 13:00 -0500, Jerrold Robaidek wrote:
> Hi Steve and Pete,
> 
> I would prefer this change occur (early) next week ... I have to get all 
> naming conventions from 
> ftpprd ... I may even have them around here some place.  I will need to 
> change some of my pqact 
> entries, and so will some of my local users.  When is good for you Pete?
> 
> I assume the GRIB2 also be available?  I also assume only the paths change, 
> and
> the individual grib message names will stay the same.
> 
> Will the tgsv32.nws.noaa.gov still feed some sites?   I use 
> flood.atmos.uiuc.edu as a backup ... I 
> realize that I'll have to have both the old and the new pqact entries, but 
> since the checksum should 
> still eliminate duplicates, that shouldn't be a problem.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jerry
> 
> 
> 
> Steve Chiswell wrote:
> > Pete and Jerry,
> > 
> > I would like to ensure that Jerry is getting the best possible data
> > delivery from
> > CONDUIT. At the same time, we need to proceed with the upgrade of
> > CONDUIT to
> > the new NCEP ldmhost which aside from providing a redundant host at the
> > source of
> > data insertion to the LDM will increase the amount of data available to
> > sites.
> > While this has been a time of vaction schedules for many people, we
> > probably
> > want to move forward if at all possible.
> > 
> > The complicating factor is that the data set names will transition from
> > the tgftp.nws.noaa.gov file names to the ftpprd.ncep.noaa.gov file
> > names.
> > If Jerry is willing to work with the new file names, I can get the new
> > data
> > turned on to his host immediately.  We can proceed with just the
> > 1 degree data files, or the entire feed as desired.
> > 
> > 
> > Steve Chiswell
> > Unidata User Support
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 13:43 -0500, Pete Pokrandt wrote:
> >> In a previous message to me, you wrote: 
> >>
> >>  >
> >>  >Pete,
> >>  >  Unfortunately, I only keep the data from the last couple of days, so I 
> >> can'
> >>   >t check from over the 
> >>  >weekend.  The user has told me that they have missed data other than 
> >> from the
> >>   > 6 UTC run....
> >>  >
> >>  >I was able to look at 7/31 ... no GFS messages were missed that day.
> >>
> >> Ok, keep an eye on things, let me know if reception improves now that
> >> I have rescheduled the backup to try to fall in between gfs runs.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Pete
> >>
> >>  >
> >>  >So far Today:
> >>  >
> >>  >RUN=00 DAY=20060801 NONE missing
> >>  >RUN=06 DAY=20060801
> >>  >20060801 run=06 forecast=045 expected=328 actual=327
> >>  >20060801 run=06 forecast=048 expected=328 actual=234
> >>  >20060801 run=06 forecast=051 expected=328 actual=236
> >>  >20060801 run=06 forecast=054 expected=328 actual=294
> >>  >20060801 run=06 forecast=057 expected=328 actual=290
> >>  >20060801 run=06 forecast=060 expected=328 actual=297
> >>  >20060801 run=06 forecast=063 expected=328 actual=311
> >>  >20060801 run=06 forecast=066 expected=328 actual=326
> >>  >20060801 run=06 forecast=069 expected=328 actual=327
> >>  >RUN=12 DAY=20060801 NONE missing
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  >Jerry
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  >Steve Chiswell wrote:
> >>  >> Jerry,
> >>  >> 
> >>  >> Can you send me your "request" lines related to CONDUIT for your ldm
> >>  >> so that I can see if this might be related to an auto shifting problem.
> >>  >> Note that motherlode is downstream of f5 at U. Wisc. so that
> >>  >> might be an issue in what you are looking at.
> >>  >> 
> >>  >> Steve Chiswell
> >>  >> Unidata User Support
> >>  >> 
> >>  >> 
> >>  >> On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 11:34, Jerrold Robaidek wrote:
> >>  >>> Hi,
> >>  >>>
> >>  >>> Has anyone else noticed that over the last few weeks, some of the 
> >> CONDUIT 
> >>   >1 degree GFS data has been 
> >>  >>> missed?  It's been happening for a few weeks, but today was the first 
> >> time
> >>   > we compared our missing 
> >>  >>> to what motherlode received (or missed).
> >>  >>>
> >>  >>> Here is an example:
> >>  >>> The status file indicates that there should be 328 grib messages for 
> >> 20060
> >>   >801 06 UTC run, the 48 
> >>  >>> hour forecast.
> >>  >>>
> >>  >>> Motherlode got 227
> >>  >>> We(pepe) got  234
> >>  >>>
> >>  >>> I can not pin point the exact day this began, but one of our users 
> >> has not
> >>   >iced intermittent missing 
> >>  >>> data for at least a couple of weeks
> >>  >>>
> >>  >>> Thanks,
> >>  >>>
> >>  >>> Jerry
> >>  >>>
> >>  >>>
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  >-- 
> >>  >Jerrold Robaidek                       Email:  address@hidden
> >>  >SSEC Data Center                       Phone: (608) 262-6025
> >>  >University of Wisconsin                Fax: (608) 263-6738
> >>  >Madison, Wisconsin
> >>  >
> >>  
> >> >=============================================================================
> >>   >==
> >>  >To unsubscribe conduit, visit:
> >>  >http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing-list-delete-form.html
> >>  
> >> >=============================================================================
> >>   >==
> >>  >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> +>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>+<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<+
> >> ^ Pete Pokrandt                    V 1447  AOSS Bldg  1225 W Dayton St^
> >> ^ Systems Programmer               V Madison,         WI     53706    ^
> >> ^                                  V      address@hidden       ^
> >> ^ Dept of Atmos & Oceanic Sciences V (608) 262-3086 (Phone/voicemail) ^
> >> ^ University of Wisconsin-Madison  V       262-0166 (Fax)             ^
> >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<+>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>+
> 
> 
-- 
Steve Chiswell <address@hidden>
Unidata