You could probably do something like that. Sounds like
a lot of work to a retired guy ;)
Bill
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006, Andrea Antonello wrote:
>
> Alright but there could be a workaround, I guess. An idea could be to create a
> method that divides (virtually) the visible part into smaller pieces, zooms
> into
> them and creates tiles of what is visible. At the end everything is
> merged to a bigger image. Probably that should be possible to do
> offscreen with a display that is not visible.
>
> Right?
> Andrea
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> * [A.D. 14/11/06 12:55], Bill Hibbard <billh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> probably wrote:
> > > I see in the mailinglist archives that it is only possible to create a
> > > buffered image of the size of the screen throught the getImage method.
> > > Is that true? No way to create custom ones that take into consideration
> > > the current resolution of the visualized data?
> >
> > That's right.
> >
> > Good luck,
> > Bill
>
==============================================================================
To unsubscribe visad, visit:
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing-list-delete-form.html
==============================================================================
