IMHO we'll have to live with the fact that some servers may offer
coverages not "compatible" with others, in the extreme case even across
the same server.
I wouldn't enforce by standard that a server does reprojection on coverages.
feel free to flame me... ;-)
-Peter
John Caron wrote:
Kari Hoijarvi wrote:
I don't know the correct CRS for the output data, but as a programmer
I'd like suggest an approach from different direction:
Everybody should support at least EPSG:4326.
Because then you can overlay anything with anything else, with a
simple offset+factor calculation. This would solve our problems
immediately.
Having additional projections is a nice plus, though.
I guess this would imply that everyone must support reprojection to a
lat/lon grid. In Unidata's case we've been trying to see whether WCS
can be used for serving "raw" data.
--
Dr. Peter Baumann
- Professor of Computer Science, International University Bremen
www.faculty.iu-bremen.de/pbaumann, mail: p.baumann@xxxxxxxxxxxx
tel: +49-421-200-3178, fax: +49-421-200-49-3178
- Executive Director, rasdaman GmbH
www.rasdaman.com, mail: baumann@xxxxxxxxxxxx
tel: +49-89-67000146, fax: -67000147, mobile: +49-173-5837882
"A brilliant idea is a job halfdone."
