[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 20020714: support-netcdf Coding Assistance C++

>To: address@hidden
>From: Steve Nguyen <address@hidden>
>Subject: Coding Assistance C++
>Organization: UCAR/Unidata
>Keywords: 200207142318.g6ENIva29161

Hi Eggy,

> I am given unknown sized limit"s" to apply to a
> multi-dimensional array.
> 
> Example : 
> int row; int col;
> 
> int **weather = new int*[row];
> int *weatherblock = new int[row * col];
> 
> Is this correct?
> I am a smidge worried I might screw this up.

In the C++ interface, the put method requires the location of the
beginning of a contiguous block of values, as in the example program
in "src/cxx/example.cpp" from the netCDF source distribution:

    static float P_data[2][4][3] = {
        {{950, 951, 952}, {953, 954, 955}, {956, 957, 958}, {959, 960, 961}},
        {{962, 963, 964}, {965, 966, 967}, {968, 969, 970}, {971, 972, 973}}
      };
    P->put(&P_data[0][0][0], P->edges());

So using "weatherblock" as you have defined it above would be OK for
writing a two-dimensional array of values with one put call, since
they are all in contiguous locations.  But your definition for
weather:

  int **weather = new int*[row];

has not actually allocated any array storage (just an array of
pointers to rows) and even if you allocate the actual storage for the
rows in a loop, the resulting storage will only be contiguous for each
row, not for the whole array.  So that would work with the netCDF C++
interface only if you intend to write out one row at a time, rather
than the whole array in one call.

I hope I've interpreted your question as you intended.  Let us know if
this is still not clear ...

--Russ

_____________________________________________________________________

Russ Rew                                         UCAR Unidata Program
address@hidden                     http://www.unidata.ucar.edu