[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

951107: netCDF software enquiry

>From: address@hidden
>Organization: University of Oklahoma
>Keywords: 199511072242.AA26047 netCDF

Tim,

Hi Tim, long time no hear!

>Can you tell me the email address to send enquiries about netCDF software,

You can send questions directly to Unidata User Support at the address
you sent this note to: address@hidden.  If there is a question
that concerns the netCDF community, you can send a note to the netCDF
group: address@hidden.

>or please forward this to the appropriate address?  The question is:
>
>Is there DOS or OS/2 software to support netCDF data access?  

Yes.

>I would be
>happy with utilities that only READ data from netCDF files, but would like
>utilities to write data under those operating systems as well.

We support netCDF on OS/2 1.2/3 using the Microsoft C 6.0 and Fortran 5.1
compilers.  We have on MSDOS using the same compilers.  Others in the
community have built using different compilers.

>If there is, please send me information on how I might obtain the software.

The best thing to do is to get to our WWW Homepage:

URL: http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/

Go to the entry labeled netCDF and you can get all the information that
you need (including which platforms are supported).

>Thanks

Talk to you later...

>Tim Hughes
>Oklahoma Climatological Survey
>"address@hidden"

Tom Yoksas

>From address@hidden Tue Nov  7 23:35:29 1995
>Thanks for the info..  I'll look it right up.

>I do have an idea to pitch to Dave Fulker sometime - has to do with
>coordinating an effort to consolidate data from the ever-growing number of
>RWIS (road-weather information systems) that are going in across the country.
>I'm getting the impression that some people (like folks in Minnesota) are
>wanting to move away from the closed systems that the vendors (like SSI and
>Vaisala) are offering.  I might go to a workshop on this in December so I'll
>learn more there.  If you've heard much from folks in this field, let me
>know your impression.

>Thanks again.  Tim