[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[McIDAS #APD-338129]: GFS data on ADDE.UCAR.EDU
- To: Dostalek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [McIDAS #APD-338129]: GFS data on ADDE.UCAR.EDU
- From: "Unidata McIDAS Support" <support-mcidas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2008 17:39:43 -0700
- Delivered-to: support-mcidas@unidata.ucar.edu by laraine.unidata.ucar.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 658CCCB182; Sat, 8 Mar 2008 17:39:43 -0700 (MST) id 44A50D5116; Sat, 8 Mar 2008 17:39:43 -0700 (MST)
Hi Jack,
re:
> ...CONUS 190.5 km grid (grid 202). ... the data ... is shifted to the south
> relative to output on the other grids available
> GFS201: Mean sea level pressure on grid 201 (NH polar stereographic, grid spacing 381 km)
> GFS202: Mean sea level pressure on grid 202 (CONUS polar stereographic, grid spacing 190.5 km)
> GFS213: Mean sea level pressure on grid 213 (CONUS polar stereographic, grid spacing 95.25 km)
I ran a number of inter-comparisons between different projections and models for P at MSL
for the same model run time and forecast hour. It seems clear that the 202 grid plot looks
shifted southward in all tests I ran on Saturday, day 2008068.
My first guess is that the calculation of the row number of the pole is off. I will be
looking through the code to see I can see anything obviously wrong.
More later...
Cheers,
Tom
****************************************************************************
Unidata User Support UCAR Unidata Program
(303) 497-8642 P.O. Box 3000
support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Boulder, CO 80307
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unidata HomePage http://www.unidata.ucar.edu
****************************************************************************
Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: APD-338129
Department: Support McIDAS
Priority: Normal
Status: Open
