[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[IDV #VZO-499858]: 00Z vs. 12Z in station data time_observation
- To: yates@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: [IDV #VZO-499858]: 00Z vs. 12Z in station data time_observation
- From: "Unidata IDV Support" <support-idv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 19:36:59 -0600
- Delivered-to: support-idv@unidata.ucar.edu by laraine.unidata.ucar.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAACDCB199; Wed, 28 May 2008 19:36:59 -0600 (MDT) id 9D3B8D4FBA; Wed, 28 May 2008 19:36:59 -0600 (MDT)
Hi David-
> Full Name: David Yates
> Email Address: yates@xxxxxxxx
> Organization: ncar
> Package Version: 2.4 build date:2007-12-20 16:34 UTC
> Operating System: Windows XP
> Hardware: Java: home: C:\Program Files\IDV_2.4\jre version: 1.5.0_11 j3d:1.3.2 fcs (build12)
> Description of problem: I've got a station data file, (attached), that has a defined variable,
> time_observation = "seconds since 2008-05-25 1200 UTC"
> if the hour time is not 0000 UTC, IDV does not recogonize this (the
> above example won't wsork since it is 1200 UTC.
> Should it work for non- 0Z times, or do I need to establish
> a base time and reference all seconds off that (I worry that the
> seconds_since value will get too large). Thanks, David Yates
Change the date spec to be:
"seconds since 2008-05-25 12:00 UTC"
and it should work. Apparently, it doesn't like 1200 without the
colon.
Don
Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: VZO-499858
Department: Support IDV
Priority: Normal
Status: Open