>Is it better to return the following VisAD MathType:
>
> (FunctionType (Real): (time) -> (lat, lon), FunctionType:
> (time) -> FunctionType (Real): (altitude) -> (pressure, temperature))
>
>which is a Tuple of two, separate Fields -- or this, equivalent, one:
>
> (FunctionType (Real): (time) -> (lat, lon,
> FunctionType (Real): (altitude) -> (pressure, temperature)))
>
>which is a Field with a Tuple range comprising two Scalars and a Field?
>
>--Steve
Hi Steve,
In the latter case, lat and lon are not grouped into a tuple which wouldn't
be desirable if they are to have a reference tuple type. For example,
map coordinates. Also, the first MathType may be representable as a
FlatFields with List1DSet domain Sets. Any other ideas?
TomR
