Did this have anything to do with the C/N drop around 1820 GMT?
Mark
On October 4, 2012 at 5:49 PM Gilbert Sebenste <sebenste@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Oct 2012, Michael Dross wrote:
>
> > Maybe that's because it's still consider a "test" channel? Not sure when it
> > becomes the POLARSAT channel? Somewhat confused..
>
> I saw that. If it's a test channel, it shouldn't have any official
> benchmarks of reliability, right? Oh, well. In any case, I'm glad
> to see them adding stuff to NOAAport...it means it will be around
> longer. :-)
>
> *******************************************************************************
> Gilbert Sebenste ********
> (My opinions only!) ******
> Staff Meteorologist, Northern Illinois University ****
> E-mail: sebenste@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ***
> web: http://weather.admin.niu.edu **
> Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/NIU_Weather **
> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/niu.weather *
> *******************************************************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> noaaport mailing list
> noaaport@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For list information or to unsubscribe, visit:
> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/
