Well, F03, is still a wrapper, but not in the same way as the older
versions :)
2014-11-06 19:48 GMT+00:00 Nick Papior Andersen <nickpapior@xxxxxxxxx>:
> My basic understanding is this:
> 1. The "old" version of the fortran library (<=4.2) was just a wrapper
> 1a. The F90 interface was a wrapper for the fortran library.
> 2. Later versions can utilize the fortran 03 library which is a (to my
> understanding) complete interface to the c library using F03 standard
> interface operability, so here it is not a wrapper.
> 2a. If not compiled against the F03 std it is very similar (if not
> totally?) to the older versions.
>
> 2014-11-06 19:30 GMT+00:00 Chris Barker <chris.barker@xxxxxxxx>:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Nick Papior Andersen <
>> nickpapior@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Sure, it was more a pedantic outburst... :)
>>> I just think supplying both is crucial. :)
>>>
>>
>> Sure -- and I haven't looked at th code -- is the Fortran lib just a
>> wrapper around the C lib anyway?
>>
>> -Chris
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
>> Oceanographer
>>
>> Emergency Response Division
>> NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice
>> 7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax
>> Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception
>>
>> Chris.Barker@xxxxxxxx
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Kind regards Nick
>
--
Kind regards Nick
